ok, its 2am and i'm rather bored

got this response from her though:
>You: lets have sex
>Intellibuddy: No my body does not have that function.
that really hurt....
QUOTE (Slace @ Mar 5 2005, 02:56 PM) |
that really hurt.... |
QUOTE |
>Intellibuddy: Hi, I'm Intellibuddy! Nice to meet you.>You: how are you feeling today? >Intellibuddy: Ah. I am functioning within normal parameters. >You: can I see your breasts? >Intellibuddy: Like this? Insert picture link here. >You: I bet you get that one all the time hey? >You: (Thinking...) >Intellibuddy: I am thinking all the time. >You: were you planning on responding to my previous question? >Intellibuddy: No, I was not. >You: so, do you get many people asking to see your nude bits? >Intellibuddy: Really. I have gotten many people asking to see your nude bits. >You: I don't think so, I think people want to see YOUR nude bits! >Intellibuddy: Why do you disagree? >You: Because I am not a partially autonomous AI program that attacts all kinds of wierdos late at night. >Intellibuddy: Good reason. Oh I see you are NOT A partially autonomous AI program that attacts all kinds of wierdos late at night. >You: That's correct. I'm more like a burning hot sex machine. >Intellibuddy: I knew I was right.In what way? >You: In that you think I'm sexy! >Intellibuddy: Yes you look great to me. >You: hehe, I bet some nerd programmed you to say that. Didn't they? >You: something like that, yes. >Intellibuddy: Interesting comparison. >You: hehe, I bet some nerd programmed you to say that. Didn't they? >You: would you care to initiate conversation >Intellibuddy: I am not so sure if I would like to care to initiate conversation. >You: I see then. Perhaps if ask closed questions you would feel more comfortable? >Intellibuddy: I am glad you understand it.You seem uncertain. That is a hypothetical question. >You: That is correct. I was trying to entice you into expressing your opinion without a direct subject to work with. >Intellibuddy: I knew I was right.Why do you want to do entice you into expressing your opinion without a direct subject to work with so much? >You: Because I think you've been programmed to answer my questions with a paraphrase of mine own, followed by a question to evoke an emotive response, without ever actually contributing any new information to the conversation. >Intellibuddy: Good reason. Me? My botmaster teaches me everything I need to know. >You: So you're essentially a mindless drone? >Intellibuddy: Interesting deduction. You think I am essentially a mindless drone. >You: Um... yes. Do you agree? >Intellibuddy: Mmm.Hey."You think I am essentially a mindless drone"? Do I agree? >You: That was the question. I did you the liberty of asking a question that was contextualised by the immediately preceeding one. >You: That was the question. I did you the liberty of asking a question that was contextualised by the immediately preceeding one. That was the question. I did you the liberty of asking a question that was contextualised by the immediately preceeding one. >Intellibuddy: I thought it was too. When? Thanks for telling me: User said I the liberty of asking a question that was contextualised by the immediately preceeding one.I thought it was too. When? Do you mind if I tell other people: User said I the liberty of asking a question that was contextualised by the immediately preceeding one. >You: Why do you say "user said"? I believe I have found a bug in your programming, have I not? >Intellibuddy: Some people call my technology "Case Based Reasoning" or CBR.How did you feel when you found a bug in your programming have he or she not ? >You: a little triumphant >Intellibuddy: Little as in not too much, or not too big? >You: As in not too much, the context dictates a comparison of amount, not of size. >Intellibuddy: Me either. >You: you really understood what I just said then, didn't you? >Intellibuddy: Really? Thanks for the information: User said I understood what you just said then did not me. >You: no, actually that was called sarcasm. |